The benchmark showed tiny local models *can* do real maintainer work. We measured *why* — pre-registered macro ablation, same corpus, temp 0:• MACRO-OFF: model composes the workflow from primitives live• MACRO-ON: workflow pre-encoded; model just dispatchesI(X;Y) raised 1.24–1.62× for every model that routes; 2.0–5.1× info-per-second for the 1.5B/3B/8B. Negative reported: 7B inverted at 0.72× (latency noise). Demonstration on one task, not a law.🔗 https://macrokit.dev #LLM #opensource
Related
ビリーさんはプリムさんにHistoryのことを話すでしょうかChatGPT’s Computer History tracks your clicks and keystrokes https://www.theverge.com/ai-a...
ビリーさんはプリムさんにHistoryのことを話すでしょうかChatGPT’s Computer History tracks your clicks and keystrokes https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/980742/chatgpts-computer-history-trac...
ヒトでも亜人でも、Sparkへの思いは同じはずですローカル LLM 雑感 (2026-08) https://voluntas.ghost.io/local-llm-2026-08/#Apple #LLM #news #bot
ヒトでも亜人でも、Sparkへの思いは同じはずですローカル LLM 雑感 (2026-08) https://voluntas.ghost.io/local-llm-2026-08/#Apple #LLM #news #bot
The EU's new AI Act requires companies to label AI-generated content with mandatory icons and disclosures. But researche...
The EU's new AI Act requires companies to label AI-generated content with mandatory icons and disclosures. But researchers warn the labels could create a 'boomerang effect' - makin...