I'm wondering if for critical OpenSource projects we should use similar rules for #LLM coding as we have for #ReverseEngineering:Let the LLM code s.th., read it, understand it. You have to review it anyway before submitting. Then throw it away and implement it yourself a day later. And if you can't then any "Signed-off-by" to the original LLM code would have been a lie anyways?Maybe such an approach should have a new tag instead of the unspecific "Assisted-by: "?
Related
Victorian Labor's multi-million-dollar social media ad spend revealedBy Kate AshtonLabor might be splashing the cash on ...
Victorian Labor's multi-million-dollar social media ad spend revealedBy Kate AshtonLabor might be splashing the cash on online ads, but analysts say Liberal and One Nation content ...
ADT for VS Code Changes the ABAP Developer Experience — If You Accept the Scope LimitsSAP ABAP Development Tools for VS ...
ADT for VS Code Changes the ABAP Developer Experience — If You Accept the Scope LimitsSAP ABAP Development Tools for VS Code is generally available in 2026. Scope limits, MCP integ...
https://youtube.com/shorts/J6sERrYkn6A?feature=shareWhy You Can't Trap an Intelligence 1,000x Smarter Than You#aisafe #a...
https://youtube.com/shorts/J6sERrYkn6A?feature=shareWhy You Can't Trap an Intelligence 1,000x Smarter Than You#aisafe #ai #tech