I used to be willing to contribute some effort to testing and bug reporting to various #OpenSource projects. But once I hear that the project used Vibe coding? It "chills" my willingness to contribute and engage. I can't afford to be used as the "slop mopper", providing the due diligence which the #LLM user didn't do themselves.So Vice coding creates a two-pronged dilemma. Either:1) the LLM user must lie that they didn't use it - to prevent people like me from feeling the chill - and now there needs to be a sophisticated system of vetting to ensure LLMs *weren't* used, if not mentioned. That adds a lot of complexity!2) the LLM user is truthful that they used LLMs. And now the chilling effect occurs: testing and bug reporting contribution and efforts run away from them, to avoid "mopping the slop". Where did the gains go, as seen in the broader sense of progress for the whole software project? Bug reports and testing that might have come along for free, stop coming.So at the end of the ...
Related
Odd how these are always the things. People don't understand the technology, but they do understand being unfaithful.And...
Odd how these are always the things. People don't understand the technology, but they do understand being unfaithful.And our societal construct is reinforced by tribal signaling on...
@ErikJonker For software development, I am an AI sceptic. I still believe that TCO (total cost of ownership) of AI-gener...
@ErikJonker For software development, I am an AI sceptic. I still believe that TCO (total cost of ownership) of AI-generated software will be much higher than traditional methods, ...
I read a cool analogy between LLMs and vector math recently. Freely paraphrased: If steps in programming are vectors, th...
I read a cool analogy between LLMs and vector math recently. Freely paraphrased: If steps in programming are vectors, then LLMs greatly can increase the vector magnitude, but you s...