@nzakas> But that [#LLM review of #LLM-generated code] is the way it has to be. Humans can't possibly do all this reviewing […]That is not the way it has to be, of course: We can reject that proposed way, for all the reasons you give.Many projects are deciding that #GenAI, in addition to its fundamental unethical implementation, is not a way for humans to build software together. They are therefore enacting policy to reject such submissions.This way is open to you, too.
Related
itch.io löscht Terabytes an KI-Slop und führt No-AI-Filter einitch.io hat mehrere Terabyte KI-generierter Inhalte gelösc...
itch.io löscht Terabytes an KI-Slop und führt No-AI-Filter einitch.io hat mehrere Terabyte KI-generierter Inhalte gelöscht und führt einen No-AI-Filter ein. Die KI-Offenlegungspfli...
«Вайб-кодинг». Как создавать промышленное ПО с помощью ИИ, агентов и команд разработчиковВ первой польской энциклопедии ...
«Вайб-кодинг». Как создавать промышленное ПО с помощью ИИ, агентов и команд разработчиковВ первой польской энциклопедии 18 века статья про лошадь состояла из одной фразы: «Что тако...
Amazon's HOPE prunes MoE experts 50%, gains 6.1% on codingAmazon's HOPE method prunes half the experts in large MoE mode...
Amazon's HOPE prunes MoE experts 50%, gains 6.1% on codingAmazon's HOPE method prunes half the experts in large MoE models by accounting for expert partnerships, gaining 6.1% on ag...